zaoniao - User contributions [en]

Bribery Investigations Spark Shareholder Suits

2019-05-05T14:06:29Z

MosheLee100: Created page with "[https://Www.cravath.com/lawyers/ cravath.com]Increased enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act is leading to a sharp rise in related shareholder suits against U.S. p..."

[https://Www.cravath.com/lawyers/ cravath.com]Increased enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act is leading to a sharp rise in related shareholder suits against U.S. public companies, a Reuters Legal analysis shows. Over the past four years, the Justice Department has filed 95 enforcement actions for alleged violations of the FCPA, which bars the companies from bribing foreign officials or executives at companies owned by foreign governments — compared to 23 such actions in the prior four years. More than 240 federal criminal or civil investigations related to potential FCPA violations are under way, government reports indicate. Investigations — which have netted the government billions of dollars in penalties — have been a boon to a growing segment of the plaintiffs’ bar that sues companies under scrutiny for alleged overseas bribery. Since the beginning of this year alone, plaintiffs’ lawyers have filed 24 shareholder suits against companies that have disclosed FCPA investigations, according to the Reuters Legal analysis of Westlaw data. In recent years, the average has been about eight such [https://www.theselc.org/legal-profession lawsuits] a year. The cases are mix of class actions and derivative suits. Westlaw, a Thomson Reuters business, is an online research service that includes thousands of databases of [https://Www.Nwrealtor.com/event/battle-of-the-barristers-4/ judicial] rulings, [https://www.sfbar.org/barristers/sections_environment.aspx lawsuits] and other legal information. None of the 24 shareholder suits has yet reached the motion-to-dismiss stage. But history suggests that plaintiffs collect in a majority of such suits: A review of these cases filed in the prior four years tuned up 37, of which 26 resulted in the company’s paying a settlement. Companies contending with anti-bribery investigations are ripe for shareholder suits because such investigations are generally considered "material events" of the sort that public companies must disclose to investors — and are often bad news for the stock. If the government succeeds in extracting fines, disgorgement of bribery-related profits or guilty pleas, plaintiffs can more easily show damage to shareholders. ‘SALACIOUS PART OF LAW’ Lately, huge payouts to the federal government have become more common. In the last two years, companies have paid FCPA fines and disgorgements worth more than $2.6 billion, nearly triple the value of settlements in the prior four years, according to [https://Search.Seznam.cz/?q=data%20compiled&count=10&pId=yet7Y1MWwcx9wGBnDlDp data compiled] by law firm Shearman & Sterling. In shareholder cases that come on the heels of a big FCPA settlement, juries are more inclined to be sympathetic to the plaintiffs, lawyers say. Concern about large potential verdicts can trigger big settlements. "Bribery is a salacious part of law. It’s something that people can understand — and it gets them angry," said Hamilton Lindley, an associate at six-lawyer Goldfarb Branham in Dallas, one of about two dozen firms that have filed FCPA-related lawsuits in the last year. Plaintiffs’ lawyers are also drawn to these cases because companies under federal bribery scrutiny typically have already endured bad press and spent millions on outside counsel and globe-trotting forensic accountants. Avon Products, for example, spent $48 million in the first six months of this year on an internal investigation sparked by an employee’s claim that company personnel made improper payments to Chinese officials. After the company disclosed the allegations to the Justice Department and Securities and Exchange Commission, which opened investigations, three shareholder suits were filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. An Avon spokeswoman declined to comment on the investigations or the private litigation. SUITS EVOKE INFORMATION The recent experience of California-based SciClone Pharmaceuticals demonstrates the FCPA litigation machine in action. SciClone, which makes cancer drugs, [https://Www.youtube.com/watch?v=4AHDpzzvUJ4 disclosed] on August 9 that the Justice Department and SEC had launched investigations related to its interactions with government officials and government-owned firms in China. The next day, SciClone stock closed down 31.9 percent, and within two days, eight law firms issued news releases announcing their own "investigations" into whether the company violated federal securities laws. Over the next six weeks, some of these firms and a few others filed shareholder class-action suits against SciClone in the Northern District of California. The cases are pending. A SciClone spokeswoman said the company was cooperating with the federal investigation; she declined to discuss the private litigation. Publicizing an "investigation" on firm websites and through the media has become a common tactic for plaintiffs’ lawyers filing suits over corporate FCPA-related disclosures. These lawyers say that the announcements in part are designed to smoke out potentially damaging information from insiders and to surface shareholders who may be interested in pursuing litigation. Defendants do sometimes prevail. In 2008, Texas oilfield services firm Baker Hughes was hit with four shareholder suits after it paid $44 million in fines to settle FCPA investigations by the Justice Department. All the suits were [http://www.startribune.com/minnesota-supreme-court-taking-aim-at-mental-health-crisis-in-legal-profession/506606552/ dismissed]. Sam Cooper, a partner in the Houston office of Baker Botts, who represents Baker Hughes, sees something of a plaintiffs’ lawyer feeding-frenzy at work. "They see an area where the government is going to remain aggressive," he said. "But so far, the courts have said that doesn’t necessarily add up to a claim." In Huron scandal, shadows of Arthur Andersen A global consulting company that rose from the ashes of the destroyed accounting firm Arthur Andersen is now facing a scandal of its own. The problems at [https://Www.Youtube.com/watch?v=phixtPhc160 Huron Consulting] Group Inc (HURN.O) may reflect a corporate culture that carried over from Arthur Andersen, the firm that [https://www.law.com/ctlawtribune/2019/01/23/how-rude-is-there-a-civility-problem-in-the-legal-profession/ collapsed] in connection with the Enron Corp scandal in 2002, legal and corporate governance experts say. Chicago-based Huron was founded by two dozen Andersen partners. Gary Holdren, once a senior Andersen partner and a member of its executive committee, on Friday resigned as Huron’s chairman and CEO after Huron said it would restate more than three years of earnings because of misreported costs related to acquisitions. The chief financial officer and chief accounting officer are also departing. The company also said it was investigating its allocation of chargeable hours in response to an inquiry by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Huron did not return calls requesting interviews. Huron shares lost more than two-thirds of their value on Monday. Attorney [https://hamiltonlindley.org/made-to-stick-why-some-ideas-thrive-and-others-die-book-review/Hamilton%20Lindley Hamilton Lindley] of the Kendall Law Group, a Dallas-based law firm, said he expected a class-action complaint to be filed on behalf of shareholders this week. "It’s natural to look into whether the culture of Arthur Andersen bled over into the culture of Huron Consulting," Lindley said. "That’s a question we will pursue in our investigation." Huron’s audit committee discovered shareholders of four businesses Huron bought redistributed portions of their payments among themselves and to certain Huron employees. Huron said payments were not "kickbacks" to Huron managers. LESSON LEARNED? Andersen’s corporate culture emphasized maximizing fee revenue rather than a client’s best interests, and it may have gotten "transferred" to Huron, said Dr. Barbara Lay Toffler, author of the 2003 book "Final Accounting: Ambition, Greed and the Fall of Arthur Andersen." [http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198259459.001.0001/acprof-9780198259459-chapter-5 oxfordscholarship.com]"My reaction is, ‘Didn’t you learn your lesson once?’" said Toffler, who worked for Andersen for four years in the 1990s and was part of a group that reported to Holdren, the future Huron CEO. She said Holdren started a Midwest consulting group within Andersen in response to a client’s request to create an outside monitor to ensure Drexel Burnham Lambert did not destroy documents while the [https://www.Ie.edu/insights/articles/the-new-challenges-of-the-legal-profession-and-business-world/ investment bank] was under investigation. Andersen was then viewed as a trusted corporate watchdog. Holdren’s litigation services group evolved into a collection of consulting groups, including one focused on business fraud. "It was a culture that simply wanted to bring in revenue, regardless of what they had to do to get it," Toffler said. Andersen tried to convert existing audit clients to a host of consulting services with little regard to emerging conflicts of interest, she added. For example, it tried to both sell internal audit services to clients and pitch Andersen as external auditors. "Unfortunately, there probably were practices that became the way you do things at Andersen that simply got transferred — that Holdren and others transferred," Toffler said, adding she spoke as an expert on Andersen rather than on Huron. "For the time I was there working for these folks, no one ever asked me what did you do? They just wanted to know how much did you make on it?" REGULATORY EXPERTS Huron had built a reputation as an expert on litigation and regulatory issues. It advised United Airlines UAUA.O on its bankruptcy and helped uncover accounting shortfalls at [https://www.chambersstudent.co.uk/where-to-start/trends-affecting-the-legal-profession mortgage giant] Fannie Mae, FNM.N which eventually led the SEC to charge Fannie Mae with fraud. In 2007, Huron was named among BusinessWeek’s hot growth companies and last year was ranked on a Fortune list of 100 fastest-growing U.S. companies. To be sure, the scandal could turn out to be a misunderstanding or a "colossal mistake," said David Becher, an associate professor of finance at Drexel University in Philadelphia, and a fellow in the university’s corporate governance center. But the fact that senior Huron executives resigned may lead to concerns that executives were trying to manipulate earnings by making it seem like they paid less then they really did for the companies they acquired, he said. "They bill themselves as (experts who) help people get through these difficult regulatory environment post-Sarbanes Oxley," said Becher, in reference to the corporate governance and accounting law passed after the Enron scandal. "You’d think they would know." The linked [https://www.superlawyers.com/about/selection_process.html?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal collapses] of Enron and Andersen convinced regulators more scrutiny of corporate accounting was needed, with added outside controls. But such controls are inadequate, Becher said, if individuals decide to commit fraud. "The controls were there, and when they caught it they did the right thing, but time will tell what was going on," Becher said. "Why didn’t the board know before then? How was it able to go on for three-and-a-half years? Why didn’t the auditors catch this?"

User:MosheLee100

2019-05-05T14:06:26Z

MosheLee100: Created page with "The Dallas trial law firm Deans & Lyons is pleased to announce that Hamilton Lindley has earned a spot on D Magazine's listing of "The Best Lawyers in Dallas." Mr. Lindley was..."

The Dallas trial law firm Deans & Lyons is pleased to announce that Hamilton Lindley has earned a spot on D Magazine's listing of "The Best Lawyers in Dallas." Mr. Lindley was [https://Www.Thesaurus.com/browse/unrecognized recognized] among Dallas' top lawyers for his work in securities litigation and enforcement. [https://Www.Youtube.com/watch?v=x7ADIWeDMgQ youtube.com]To compile the list of the city's top attorneys, D Magazine solicited nominations from 9,000 lawyers and judges throughout North Texas.[https://Www.Farrellfritz.com/attorneys/ farrellfritz.com] Fellow attorneys vote for nominee's that demonstrate high standards in terms of quality of work and integrity in the legal profession. The publication's editors then worked with a blue-ribbon panel of lawyers to [https://Www.Dcbar.org/bar-resources/publications/washington-lawyer/articles/april-2016-uncertain-future.cfm finalize] the listing, which is featured in the May 2014 edition of D Magazine, and will be available throughout the year at http://www.dmagazine.com/. Hamilton Lindley is routinely recognized among the top lawyers in Texas. He has been featured in the Texas Super Lawyers listing of the state's top lawyers since 2010. "Representing both plaintiffs and defendants in securities litigation helps me provide unique insight to my clients," Hamilton Lindley said. "I am honored to be selected by my peers for this listing in D Magazine." Hamilton Lindley maintains a reputation as a proven trial lawyer in complex business litigation. He has extensive experience in securities litigation, life-altering personal injury cases, product safety claims, real estate litigation and [https://www.Youtube.com/watch?v=oiqMD1LvjGU construction] litigation. Contact: [https://hamiltonlindley.org/made-to-stick-why-some-ideas-thrive-and-others-die-book-review/Hamilton%20Lindley [https://hamiltonlindley.org/made-to-stick-why-some-ideas-thrive-and-others-die-book-review/Hamilton%20Lindley Hamilton Lindley]] Deans & [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DuHmf27gN8o Lyons LLP] 325 N. Saint Paul Street, Ste. 1500 Dallas, TX 75201 (214) 965-8500 [http://www.mdmc-law.com/index.cfm/attorneys/ Telephone] hlindley@deanslyons.com www.[https://www.superlawyers.com/about/selection_process.html?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal?contact=sejal deanslyons].com SOURCE Deans & Lyons LLP Waco Personal Injury Attorney Hamilton Lindley Receives Top Trial Lawyer [https://www.phillybarristers.com/ Award Waco] personal injury attorney, Hamilton Lindley, has been named one of the Top 100 [https://Www.law.com/ctlawtribune/2019/01/23/how-rude-is-there-a-civility-problem-in-the-legal-profession/ Trial Lawyers] in Texas by The National Trial Lawyers Association. As a first time recipient of the award Mr. [https://www.apartments.com/lindley-encino-ca/hz8vhv2/ Lindley] is excited to have been selected for such a high honor. The National Trial Lawyers Top 100 touts itself as an invitation-only organization composed of the premier trial lawyers from each state in the nation who meet stringent qualifications as civil plaintiff and/or criminal defense trial lawyers. Selection is based on a thorough multi-phase process which includes peer nominations combined with third-party research. Membership is extended solely to the select few of the most qualified attorneys from each state who demonstrate superior qualifications of leadership, reputation, influence, stature and public profile. Each of the distinguished Top 100 members possess the knowledge, skill, experience and success held by only the finest and best lawyers in America. By combining resources, power and influence, The National Trial Lawyers: Top 100 is devoted to preserving and protecting justice for all. Personal injury lawyer [http://Www.k-plaw.com/attorneys/ Hamilton Lindley] represents victims of accidents involving serious injuries such as brain injuries and spinal cord injuries. Dunnam & Dunnam is a full [https://Www.nelsonmullins.com/careers/careers_attorneys service firm] that includes child custody, divorce, civil litigation, [https://Tonkon.com/attorneys/ criminal defense] and other legal matters. SOURCE Dunnam & Dunnam LLP Related Links http://www.dunnamlaw.com Twin Peaks seeks venue change for lawsuit Extensive media coverage about the May 17 Twin Peaks shootout has "damaged the Twin Peaks name in general" and has made it impossible to pick an impartial jury in McLennan County, a Twin Peaks motion to move a [https://scarincihollenbeck.com/attorneys/ civil trial] claims. In response to a lawsuit filed in August by an unnamed Texas couple who were [http://www.eatingwell.com/recipes/18679/healthy-kids/lunch/school/ eating lunch] at Twin Peaks when the [https://Www.bhba.org/index.php/sections-committees/categorydetails/39-Barristers violence erupted] between rival biker groups, Twin Peaks asks 74th State Judge Gary Coley Jr.[https://palnyc2008.thankyou4Caring.org/legalluncheon thankyou4caring.org] to move the lawsuit from McLennan County to Dallas County. The lawsuit [https://www.americanbar.org/groups/lawyer_assistance/working-group_to_advance_well-being_in_legal_profession/ plaintiffs] are [https://Www.Friedfrank.com/index.cfm?pageID=4 identified] only as M.K.H. and C.R.H. Their lawsuit names as defendants Peaktastic Beverage, Front Burner Restaurants, Twin Restaurant Investment Co. and Chalik Mitra Group. The motion to change venue was filed by Twin Peaks’ parent corporation and does not appear to be on behalf of Chalik Mitra Group, the former [https://Google.com/maps/search/twin%20peaks Twin Peaks] franchise holders in Waco and Harker Heights. Both of those restaurants have been closed since the Waco incident and the franchisees have been stripped of their association with [http://www.Restaurantnews.com/twin-peaks-starts-off-2019-with-impressive-momentum-042419/ Twin Peaks]. No hearing date for the motion has been set. A tentative trial date has been set for April 4, 2016. [https://nypost.com/2019/05/04/el-chapo-asks-judge-to-fire-one-of-his-lawyers-ahead-of-sentencing/ nypost.com]The motion says that while there is a "large distinction" between the entities associated with the Twin Peaks franchisor and the franchisee that owned and [https://Www.Youtube.com/watch?v=hy-z8g30UB4 operated] the Waco restaurant, "all of the negative publicity has damaged the Twin Peaks name in general," the motion states. "Since the incident, thousands of articles have been written about the ‘Twin Peaks shootings,’ almost all of which are negative, or highly prejudicial," the motion states. "The Waco Tribune alone has written approximately 221 articles related to the shooting since the incident occurred. Almost every headline includes the Twin Peaks name or refers to the incident as the ‘May 17 Twin Peaks shootout.’ "The residents of McLennan County are bombarded with a barrage of negative information regarding ‘Twin Peaks’ on a daily basis. In addition, the incident has put Waco at the center of an international spotlight that its residents find unflattering," the motion states. While Mark Goodman, a Dallas attorney who represents Twin Peaks, did not return phone messages Monday, the Twin Peaks corporate office in Addison issued a statement about the change of venue motion. "Given the extensive, ongoing media coverage in Waco about this tragedy, we believe it would be easier to find impartial jurors outside the local area," the statement said. The suit, filed on the plaintiffs’ behalf by Waco attorney Hamilton Lindley, seeks unspecified damages for medical care for injuries suffered during the incident, physical pain and suffering, loss of earnings and mental anguish. Lindley declined comment on the change of venue motion. "In defiance of repeated law enforcement warnings, [https://www.amazon.com/Twin-Peaks-Season-1/dp/B0076HNCTQ Twin Peaks] invited rival biker gangs to its Waco restaurant on May 17, 2015," the lawsuit says. "Predictably, these rival gangs — fueled by Twin Peaks [https://Www.Youtube.com/watch?v=91bS9zHxHFQ alcohol] — began fighting." The plaintiffs, who are not affiliated with a biker group, according to the lawsuit, were having lunch there when the shooting started. "When the bullets began flying, plaintiffs were trapped inside defendants’ property and forced to find cover to avoid being shot," the suit alleges. "Plaintiffs suffered personal injuries, including cuts, bruises and abrasions. [https://Www.Sfbar.org/barristers/sections_insurance.aspx Plaintiffs] also suffered damage to their personal property and significant emotional trauma."