<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://en.zaoniao.it/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Bitcoinfactswiki</id>
	<title>Bitcoinfactswiki - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://en.zaoniao.it/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Bitcoinfactswiki"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://en.zaoniao.it/index.php?title=Bitcoinfactswiki&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-16T14:32:08Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.32.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://en.zaoniao.it/index.php?title=Bitcoinfactswiki&amp;diff=3573&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Admin: Created page with &quot;== An Unusual Fork == The website represented by [http://bitocinfactswiki.github.io The Bitcoinfactswiki] and announced in the Reddit story from its apparent creator [https://...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://en.zaoniao.it/index.php?title=Bitcoinfactswiki&amp;diff=3573&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2019-04-21T07:47:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;== An Unusual Fork == The website represented by [http://bitocinfactswiki.github.io The Bitcoinfactswiki] and announced in the Reddit story from its apparent creator [https://...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;== An Unusual Fork ==&lt;br /&gt;
The website represented by [http://bitocinfactswiki.github.io The Bitcoinfactswiki] and announced in the Reddit story from its apparent creator [https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/4n44oi/bitcoin_wiki_renamed_to_bitcoinfactswiki here] is not actually a &amp;quot;renamed&amp;quot; version of this site, but a plain fork, contrary to the claims in that story. The person behind it, Thomas Zander, is the (apparently only remaining,) developer of Bitcoin Classic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The facts on Bitcoinfactswiki are in multiple cases wrong and the information thereon regarding technical information about Bitcoin appears to be politically-motivated and -edited. For example, as of this writing the page [https://bitcoinfactswiki.github.io/NLockTime/ on Bitcoinfactswiki about nLockTime] states:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;lt;blockquote&amp;amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''This tag is deprecated and OP CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY is the suggested replacement.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This is incorrect. nLockTime is not deprecated nor is it insecure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is likely that due to the obstacle that nLockTime presents to the hard-forking narrative, it is being downplayed as a technical objection and stated to be a deprecated function even though it has been an integral part of Bitcoin transaction structure almost from Bitcoin's inception. In particular, nLockTime (or lock_time based transactions) can be used as a form of escrow. In the event of certain forms of advocated hard forks, the result would be the confiscation and/or destruction of nLockTime based escrowed funds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Source==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://bitcoin.it/ http://bitcoin.it/]&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also on BitcoinWiki==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Terminology]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Satoshi codes]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[How To Judge The Bootloader Program Is Updating Or Jump To Application Program]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Test Cases]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Monit]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Admin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
</feed>